Sabtu, 02 Desember 2017

2018 Ford Mustang Roush 729 makes LA debut

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aE7D2zWU16I

Is your Ford Mustang GT a little boring? Maybe the Roush 729 concept can give you some inspiration.

Created as a concept for this year’s SEMA show, the Roush 729 is a supercharged, wide-body version of the iconic Ford pony car, finished in eye-catching Grabber Green – used on just 95 Mustang Boss 429s were painted in 1970.

This one-of-a-kind Mustang features an array of modifications, including new Roush body add-ons in addition to a custom wide-body kit designed by Roush and Stratasys, carbon-fibre exterior components for the front splitter, rear spoiler and side skirts, along with Brembo brakes and custom Vossen RVS forged alloy wheels wrapped in Continental ExtremeContact Sport tyres.

Meanwhile, the Mustang GT’s 5.0-litre ‘Coyote’ V8 has been treated to a Roush R2650 supercharger kit, bumping the power output to over 700 horsepower (522kW).

There’s also a new (functional) hood scoop which feeds air into the supercharged engine, working in conjunction with a Roush cold air intake.

Out back, there’s an active exhaust system with quad tips which allows the driver to tune the Roush 729’s sound to their preference.

Inside, Roush has fitted custom leather Recaro racing seats finished by Katzkin, a Watson roll cage, and Sparco four-point racing harnesses – though unfortunately there are no images of the cabin.

While built as a concept study, various components used on the Roush 729 will be available to Mustang owners.

Check out our video walkaround of the Mustang Roush 729 concept above

MORE: Ford Mustang news, reviews, comparisons and video
MORE: Everything Ford
MORE: Los Angeles motor show coverage
MORE: Roush coverage

Land Rover says new Defender will polarise opinion

Land Rover design chief, Gerry McGovern, has perhaps one of the most unenviable tasks in automotive design – designing an all-new version of the iconic Land Rover Defender.

Speaking to Australian media at the Los Angeles Motor Show, McGovern suggested purists might not like what they see.

“I love the fact that all these people are enthusiastic about it,” McGovern said. “I appreciate that they’re the ones driving the euphoria but if they’re expecting to see a facsimile of the old one with all the latest tech added in, then I don’t think they’ll be satisfied.”

It’s the first time McGovern has been willing to discuss the iconic vehicle and its replacement, certainly to a motoring press keen to find out as much as they can about a vehicle that has legendary status off-road in Australia.

McGovern was keen to emphasise the fact that the all-new Defender will almost certainly become the backbone of the brand globally, and that it needed to be more capable off-road than the old model, while delivering levels of refinement, drivability and safety previously unheard of with the Defender nameplate.

Interestingly, McGovern was adamant the Defender must be relevant to buyers now, not hark back to the past to appeal to rusted on fans only.

“It must embrace new technology,” he said. “To be a success, it has to be relevant to future buyers.”

A lot of that ‘relevance’ McGovern refers to will lead to the sales success that Land Rover needs in a highly competitive global market. Over a period of 68 years, Land Rover sold just over two million Defenders.

“If you think of the Evoque over five to six years, it’s sold 700,000 units,” McGovern said. “In order to justify it’s investment, Defender will need to be a global vehicle. Future customers will not have any preconceived ideas about it, and in order to get people to come to the brand, customers will have to buy a Defender on its merit.”

“The form language, the design, has to reflect the age we live in,” McGovern said. “Whatever we do has to have absolute integrity of design, sophisticated design and that is no different for the new Defender. It has to go through the same rigour in design and for me it has to be honest and true of a vehicle we are producing today.”

McGovern however, doesn’t want enthusiasts to desert the brand though – quite the contrary. “It’s the most eagerly awaited vehicle launch in the automotive world, certainly judging by the number of times you’ve asked me about it,” he said. “And I would love enthusiasts to embrace the new Defender.”

While cheekily suggesting enthusiasts might not buy a new Defender because they already have one (or many) they love, McGovern once again confirmed he has no intention of creating a cartoon, retro version of the old one. “That said, I do think it is important to acknowledge the great heritage of the Defender in terms of capability, in terms of robustness, its durability – but not necessarily its visual quality.”

“You have to remember as it was built and evolved, the carmaker back then was like a cottage industry,” McGovern said. While he described the design as likely to polarise, McGovern said he and his team had made every effort not to think about the weight of redesigning an icon, and not get bogged down in the aspects of that, which might make the task impossible.

Above: The new Defender won’t be a shrunken Defender

He also ruled out and kind of ‘filtered down’ styling that would see the new Defender look like a Discovery derivative, for example.

“Of course it won’t look like a new Discovery,” McGovern said. “It has to go through the same rigour in design and for me, it has to be honest and true for a vehicle we’re producing today and not preoccupied with what’s gone before.” McGovern also confirmed that there are fully working prototypes undergoing testing at the moment, although final design and engineering details may change before we see the finished 4WD.

What does he think of retro design as whole, then?

“To me a retrospective approach to design proves a lack of creativity,” McGovern said.

What are your hopes for the new Defender?

MORE: Land Rover news, reviews, comparisons
MORE: Los Angeles motor show news

Mazda investigating all-wheel drive for 3 and 6

When the silk was pulled off the facelifted 2018 Mazda 6 and a turbocharged petrol engine was announced, the natural next question was whether we’d see and all-wheel drive thrown into the mix.

Speaking to media at the 2017 Los Angeles motor show, president and CEO of Mazda North America Operations, Masahiro Moro said that huge demand in the US for all-wheel drive variants of the Mazda 3 and 6 have driven the brand to investigate overcoming the current platform limitations.

“I think we are not able to combine four-wheel drive and the 2.5-litre turbo. We have a layout issue with the sedans, that’s why a four-wheel drive isn’t deployed on the Mazda 3 and 6 so far,” Moro said.

“But there is a huge demand, at least what I know is that in the east coast of the USA, 80 or 90 per cent of premium sedans are sold with all-wheel drive.”

“Four-wheel drive becomes a premium queue for US consumers and obviously I have asked our R&D department to think about how we can accommodate four-wheel drive capability in the future,” said Moro.

The platform limitation rules out all-wheel drive variants of the facelifted 2.5-litre Mazda 6 sedan and wagon. But, it also means that we could potentially see this combination employed in the future, given Mazda’s push towards a premium brand and vehicle offering.

Are you hanging out for an all-wheel drive Mazda 6?

MORE: Mazda 3 news, reviews, comparisons and video
MORE: Mazda 6 news, reviews, comparisons and video
MORE: Everything Mazda

2018 Nissan X-Trail ST-L review

When it comes to a seven-seater medium-sized SUV, the options are somewhat limited. The Nissan X-Trail provides a very reasonable choice at a decent price point, but despite its arguably modern exterior, it lacks the modern touch of its competitors on the inside.

The Japanese-built Nissan X-Trail is available in a staggering 10 different variants, ranging from five- or seven-seater front-wheel-drive models to five-seater all-wheel drive with petrol powertrains and the recently added AWD diesel that is available as a five-seater only.

As is the case, all seven-seater models, like our ST-L test car here, are only available with the petrol engine driving the front wheels. That may bother some, but we feel it’s a non-issue unless you intend to take your X-Trail to the beach or soft-roading.

From the outside, the Nissan X-Trail is probably best described as inoffensive. It’s typically Nissan in so much that it blends in, but never looks out of place for the wrong reasons. The chrome theme exemplified through the Nissan grille is carried through the roof and door handles and into the rear tailgate and rear bumper, helping bring about a sense of differentiation in the otherwise plain design.

In the striking red colour that our X-Trail came in, the family-friendly Nissan is actually a half-decent looking vehicle – well, at least on the outside.

Jump inside and it’s a bit of a different story. Considering that this class is now occupied by vehicles such as the Peugeot 3008, which feels an entire generation (or two) ahead, the X-Trail struggles to bring about a sense of emotional appeal on the inside.

There is a reasonable amount of room in the second row, so if you have two young or teenage kids, they will fit fine. The third row with its two additional seats is really there for the occasional use, or if you have a child in a booster seat (no younger or older will find it that comfortable).

The boot measures 445L when the third row is not in use, but reduced to just 135L with both third-row seats in use. However, if you only need one of the two seats in the far back, it still has plenty of room.

It’s a very old-school cabin otherwise, though, in the sense that the placement of the instruments to the way the dash flows and connects feels somewhat out of date. Especially when you consider the air-con and infotainment switchgear that could be mistaken for being from a decade-old vehicle, not to mention that they feel somewhat flimsy.

But it’s the 7.0-inch infotainment screen that really bothered us the most. The navigation system offered by Nissan in the X-Trail is extremely poor. It’s reminiscent of old Navman systems from the early 2000s. That’s not an exaggeration – it’s not only slow, but the display and usability are cumbersome at best. It’s perhaps the most inferior navigation system we’ve used in a new car for the last few years.

The quality of Bluetooth telephony was equally disappointing, with the multiple tests resulting in complaints from the other party with regard to voice clarity, forcing us to use speakerphone instead, which defeats the point.

But of course, there are lots of positives with Nissan’s offering. The X-Trail is actually a very respectable car once you get over the old-schoolness of the cabin. The ride quality is topnotch, absorbing the bumps and yet providing a more than adequate dynamic package.

On the go and even through country roads, it’s a very accommodating place to be. After a long drive from Brisbane out to Warwick and back, with our two young boys, both my wife and I felt the X-Trail was an excellent family SUV for its $39,085 (plus on-roads) asking price. We were very impressed by the limited amount of cabin noise that found its way in at 110km/h, and just how smoothly it traversed the long drives.

The ST-L models are powered by the larger of the two petrol engines on offer, the 2.5-litre naturally aspirated four-cylinder, with 126kW/226Nm coupled to a continuously variable transmission.

For an SUV that weighs 1534kg, it’s actually a surprisingly reasonable amount of grunt. Is the engine outdated? Compared to its smaller-capacity turbocharged European rivals, sure, but put it up against the same-sized power unit from the ever-popular Mazda CX-5 and the X-Trail holds its own.

The CVT tends to dull the driving experience somewhat (an area where the six-speed torque converter automatic in the Mazda shines through), but getting it up to speed or merging on the highway is a relatively effortless exercise.

The steering is rather weightless, but works well for the application. It’s well poised to respond to sudden obstacles on the road, and the suspension – as soft as it is – is very well calibrated for Australian requirements.

Nissan claims a fuel economy of just under 8L/100km, but expect to get around the mid to high 8s in a realistic day-to-day suburban driving scenario.

What we love about the X-Trail is Nissan’s addition of active safety systems now standard across the range, including what it calls Intelligent Emergency Braking (better known as autonomous emergency braking) and forward-collision warning. The ST-L also gets rear cross-traffic alert, another potential life-saving feature that should be standard on any SUV of this size.

The high-spec Ti and TL grades also get pedestrian detection as part of their autonomous braking system (odd to exclude this from the base models), as well as an adaptive front lighting system. Meanwhile, if you go for the Ti, it will also come with active cruise control and lane-departure intervention.

You won’t go wrong picking the Nissan X-Trail as your vehicle of choice, however, we would advise working with the dealer for a sharp deal, as this is a hotly contested market and there are no illusions here that the offering with Nissan is best in class.

At the end of the day, the Nissan X-Trail is a great family workhorse. It will serve its purpose as an affordable and well-built 5+2 family SUV. If seven seats are required, it should be cross-shopped with the Mitsubishi Outlander, Honda CR-V, and if price is an issue, the Holden Captiva 7. Otherwise, if it’s a five-seater medium SUV you’re after, there are more modern options for similar coin.

MORE: Nissan X-Trail news, reviews, comparisons and videos
MORE: Everything Nissan

Video: Watch a Formula E car take on a cheetah

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-9oFxYFODE

Formula E has lined John-Eric Vergne up alongside a cheetah, as part of a unique promotional stunt.

Designed to highlight the burgeoning race series’ eco-credentials, the video draws attention to the fact cheetahs are at threat of extinction. According to National Geographic, the already-low population is at risk of declining by a further 53 per cent over the next 14 years.

As the fastest land-mammal in the world, the cheetah will hit 113km/h running flat out. What’s more, it hits 100km/h in around 3.0 seconds – and instead of relying on pesky electricity, or dirty fossil-fuels for that matter, they’re powered by wildebeest and gazelles.

With around 200kW of power from its electric motors, the Formula E car has a handy top speed advantage: it hits 100km/h in the same 3.0 seconds as the cheetah, but keeps pulling to 240km/h. Turns out four wheels are faster than four legs after all.

You can probably guess the outcome of the race – spoiler alert, the purpose-built racer was faster than the four-legged creature – but it’s close for part of the race.

Check it out at the top of the story.

MORE: Formula E coverage
MORE: Motorsport news

Jumat, 01 Desember 2017

Special Vehicle Operations will keep broadening Land Rover appeal

Land Rover design chief, Gerry McGovern, has told Australian media that Special Vehicle Operations (SVO) will only serve to broaden the appeal – and reach – of the iconic luxury off-road brand.

Land Rover featured the three pillars of SVO at the Los Angeles motor show: Autobiography, R and X – all of which focus on various aspects of the brand. Range Rover gets the top-end ‘Autobiography’ treatment, Sport gets the hardcore ‘R’ badge, and Discovery becomes even more capable off-road with the ‘X’ badge.

“We’ve tried to broaden the appeal of the brand, not just Range Rover, but Land Rover in general,” McGovern said. “Previously, the Land Rover brand was very specialist, but we have moved it into vehicles that are more universally desirable, not just generic.”

While the rush to develop SUVs is nothing new, most buyers never take their vehicles off-road – no matter how capable they are. The counter argument is simple: anything wearing a Land Rover badge needs to be capable in the rough stuff, given the history and heritage of the brand.

However, SUVs have become just as much of a style and luxury statement, in a segment kick-started by the original Range Rover. McGovern knows the luxury, specialist corner of the segment is lucrative and important for all manufacturers to consider.

“The Velar was one of those vehicles [that is more universally desirable],” McGovern said. “Previously you saw the Evoque, and we will give people more choice.”

One element SVO will capture is the customisation and bespoke desires of potential buyers, who previously may have been forced to the aftermarket world. McGovern would rather those buyers have the manufacturer customise their vehicle from the outset, and not just for the obvious profit-based reasons.

“We’ve seen businesses take our vehicles from the customer and charge a premium for modifications,” McGovern said. “I would rather we did it, and did it properly, designed by the people who created the product in the first place.”

It isn’t just about money according to McGovern. Rather, it’s about a commodity just as valuable to car manufacturers – integrity.

“We need to protect the integrity of the engineering and the brand as well,” McGovern said. “Range Rover has a level of sophistication and British sensibility, different from Rolls Royce and Bentley as well quite frankly.”

Protecting that sense of exclusivity, quality and luxury is paramount, and Land Rover executives believe SVO can do just that.

“The prerequisite of any luxury brand is to have heritage that comes over time,” McGovern said, indicating that you can’t buy or build that kind go legacy. “A Range Rover, there is nothing else like it, and a lot of our customers don’t want the latest thing, they want the best – peerlessness.”

Range Rover is unique in that it needs to straddle both off-road capacity and luxury pretension – something few other luxury SUVs have to maintain.

“A Range Rover is what it is,” McGovern said.

“I’m keen to make sure we don’t lose that, position,” he explained. “Don’t lose that essence of what ‘Range Rover-ness’ is.”

With the low volume and bespoke nature of the SVO division, Land Rover has set itself up to do just that.

“My focus is making sure the brand is curated in the right way,” McGovern said.

MORE: Range Rover news, reviews, comparisons and videos
MORE: Los Angeles motor show news 

Mazda and Hyundai top customer satisfaction survey, Suzuki and Jeep at bottom

As a general rule, people are having a better time with car dealers than just a few years ago, but some brands’ franchise partners are still lagging behind the performance of industry leaders Mazda and Hyundai.

That’s a summary of the findings from market research firm J.D. Power, which this week published results from its latest annual customer survey. Overall satisfaction has climbed 48 points on a 1000-point scale since 2013, the firm says.

More specifically, of the 13 brands ranked in the mass market segment it was Mazda that again scored highest, with a total of 835 (ranked highest five times in eight years), followed by Hyundai with a score of 831 and Kia with 829.

Honda (which won the award two years ago) Nissan, Volkswagen, Suzuki and Jeep all finished below the average, with the American SUV brand finishing last for the second year running.

The 2017 Australia Customer Service Index (Mass Market) Study is based on responses from 4646 owners who purchased their new vehicle between August 2012 and September 2017, and “took their vehicle for service to an authorised dealership service centre between August 2016 and September 2017”.

Now in its eighth year, the study measures overall satisfaction with the vehicle service experience at an authorised service centre by examining five factors (listed in order of importance): service quality; vehicle pick-up; service advisor; service initiation; and service facility.


BRAND RATING (1000 max) COMMENT
Mazda 835 Among the best
Hyundai 831 Among the best
Kia 829 Better than most
Mitsubishi 825 About average
Subaru 824 About average
Ford 823 About average
Holden 823 About average
Toyota 823 About average
Market average 822 About average
Honda 817 About average
Nissan 809 The rest
Volkswagen 798 The rest
Suzuki 797 The rest
Jeep 781 The rest

Other findings:

  • Fixing the vehicle in the first service visit is now a basic expectation, in addition to receiving communication from the dealership post-service.
  • Although more than 9 in 10 customers have their vehicle returned fixed right the first time, only 48 per cent of these customers were contacted after their service.
  • Satisfaction increases by 30 points above the mass market average to 852 when customers are contacted after their vehicle’s service to ensure that all work was carried out as per their expectations.
  • The unpredictability of service bills has tapered off since 2013. 70 per cent of customers paid what they expected (increase of 7 percentage points since 2013).
  • Satisfied customers are kept informed of their vehicle status: 73 per cent of customers indicate they were kept informed by their service advisor of the status of their vehicle being serviced. Satisfaction among these customers is 30 points higher than the mass market average.
  • Most customers still call their service dealer to schedule their appointment (79 per cent); however, customers who use the internet to schedule service (11 per cent) are more satisfied
  • The study finds that 31 per cent of customers needed their service dealer to provide them with transportation while their vehicle was being serviced.

MORE: JD Power news coverage